ITsVISTA
Information that makes life easier when it comes to installing, managing, and using Windows Vista.
Start About FAQ Blogroll Shop

All tag results for ‘Server’

KB973245

September 25th, 2009 · No Comments · 235 views

Consider the following scenario:

  • You install the Microsoft Remote Server Administration Tools on a computer that is running Windows Vista or Windows Server 2008.
  • From this computer, you use the Dnscmd.exe tool or the DNS Management Microsoft Management Console (MMC) snap-in. You use one of these tools to manage a DNS service instance that is hosted on a server that is running Windows 2000 or Windows Server 2003.
  • You try to add some secondary servers to the “allowed zone transfer server” list (securelist) of a primary DNS server zone.

In this scenario, the secondary servers are not added to the securelist as expected. Additionally, the symptoms that appear for this problem depend on the number of IP addresses that you try to add to the securelist. The following are the symptoms that may appear:

  • If you try to add more than one IP address, the operation fails.
  • If you try to add only one IP address of a secondary server, the operation seems to complete successfully. However, the operation adds an address of 1.0.0.0 to the securelist, instead of the expected IP address.

For example, you try to add a “4.1.1.1″ server and a “4.2.2.2″ server to the securelist by using the following command:

dnscmd <server name> /zoneresetsecondaries <zone name> /securelist 4.1.1.1 4.2.2.2

In this case, you receive the following error message:

Command failed: DNS_ERROR_INVALID_IP_ADDRESS 9552

If you try to add only the “4.1.1.1″ server to the securelist by using the following command, an IP address of “1.0.0.0″ is incorrectly added to the securelist instead of the “4.1.1.1″ address:

dnscmd <server name> /zoneresetsecondaries <zone name> /securelist 4.1.1.1

However, in this case, you receive no error message.

KB958644

October 23rd, 2008 · 2 Comments · 3,850 views

UpdatesDescription: This security update resolves a privately reported vulnerability in the Server service. The vulnerability could allow remote code execution if an affected system received a specially crafted RPC request. On Microsoft Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Windows Server 2003 systems, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability without authentication to run arbitrary code. It is possible that this vulnerability could be used in the crafting of a wormable exploit. Firewall best practices and standard default firewall configurations can help protect network resources from attacks that originate outside the enterprise perimeter. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way that the Server service handles RPC requests. Keep reading →

TS1078907

October 8th, 2008 · No Comments · 382 views

You could not install the Autodesk Web Server (AWS) after you removed Microsoft® Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0 from your Windows Vista™ operating system.

For more information on this issue, including potential causes, workarounds, and resolutions, see: AutoDesk Knowledge Base Article TS1078907.

ITsVISTA Web Links: February 26th

February 26th, 2008 · No Comments · 1,274 views

Server 2008: The Windows Workstation we always wanted

February 26th, 2008 · No Comments · 416 views

Will Server 2008 challenge Vista in the enterprise desktop space? Keep reading →

KB947230

January 29th, 2008 · No Comments · 537 views

After a Windows Vista-based computer uses a Windows HTTP Services (WinHTTP) component, such as the ServerXmlHttp object, to send a POST request to a Web server, the same request is resent to the server.

This behavior occurs if the keep-alive connection that is used for the first POST request is reset by the Web server.

Note: To verify this behavior, you can use a network sniffer, or you can check the WinHTTP log.

KB926425

January 10th, 2008 · No Comments · 487 views

This article describes the following about this hotfix release:

  • The issues that are fixed by the hotfix package
  • The prerequisites for installing the hotfix package
  • Whether you must restart the computer after you install the hotfix package
  • Whether the hotfix package is replaced by any other hotfix package
  • Whether you must make any registry changes
  • The files that are contained in the hotfix package

KB943451

October 18th, 2007 · No Comments · 643 views

Consider the following scenario:

  • You have a server that runs the Unisys MCP operating system on a network.
  • On this network, the credentials that users use to access the MCP server differ from the logon credentials that they use to log on to the domain.
  • A user accesses a network share on the Unisys MCP server by using a Windows Vista-based client computer.
  • To access this network share, this user types the Uniform Naming Convention (UNC) path of the MCP server.

In this scenario, Windows Vista does not enumerate the share list on the server.

However, if the user accesses a network share on the Unisys MCP server by typing the Uniform Naming Convention (UNC) path together with the share name, the user can access the network share.

For example, if the user tries to access the share by typing the following UNC path, the user cannot obtain the share list on the server:

\\ServerName

However, the user can access the share by typing the UNC path together with the share name, as in the following example:

\\ServerFQDNname\ShareName

Notes:

  • In these examples, ServerName represents one of the following:
    • The FQDN name of the server
    • The IP address of the server
    • The NetBIOS name of the server
  • This issue does not occur on a Windows XP-based client computer.

KB942974

October 13th, 2007 · No Comments · 581 views

On a Windows Vista-based client computer, you can still access offline files even though the file server is removed from the network. Additionally, you cannot delete the offline files and the temporary files in the Offline Files item in Control Panel.

ITsVISTA Web Links: October 4th, 2007

October 4th, 2007 · 1 Comment · 1,145 views